|
Theology -
Theology Content
|
|
Written by William Dicks
|
|
Tuesday, 20 October 2009 05:57 |
1. Against Heresies
2. Systematic Theology
3. Interpreting Scripture
Copyright © 2002-2009 [Sovereign Truth]. All rights reserved.
No part of this document may be reproduced in any form whatsoever for financial gain, or in any commercial product whatsoever without the consent of Sovereign Truth.
However, this document may be reproduced in non-commercial products, such as church bulletins, e-mail distribution lists, etc if this copyright section is included or if credit is given to Sovereign Truth and the author. |
|
Last Updated on Tuesday, 20 October 2009 06:07 |
|
|
Theology -
Interpreting the Scriptures
|
|
Written by William Dicks
|
|
Tuesday, 20 October 2009 05:47 |
1. Introduction
When it comes to interpreting Scripture, it is important to notice the style of writing and the genre used in the writing, for it will bear upon the way the specific writing needs to be interpreted. It is no use interpreting passages that fall into the symbolic genre as literal. You will start believing in horses that fly. It is no use taking history and interpreting it as doctrine, since that will lead to believing that a work of God is identified by how long it is around.
[38] So in the present case I tell you, keep away from these men and let them alone, for if this plan or this undertaking is of man, it will fail; [39] but if it is of God, you will not be able to overthrow them. You might even be found opposing God!" So they took his advice, (Ac 5:38-39 ESV)
This is a historical account of what Gamaliel told the Jewish council concerning this new “faith.” Many today have exactly the same attitude concerning all kinds of groups. Most notably the Word-of-Faith (WOF) movement led by men such as Kenneth Copeland and also the Toronto Blessing (TB) led by men such as John Arnott. Should we take what Gamaliel said as a way of testing a work’s validity whether it is from God or not? Definitely not! Then we have to conclude that the Jehovah’s Witnesses and Mormons and the Roman Catholic Institution are works of God, since they have been around for much longer than WOF and TB!
|
|
Last Updated on Tuesday, 20 October 2009 05:50 |
|
Read more...
|
|
Theology -
Systematic Theology
|
|
Written by William Dicks
|
|
Friday, 16 October 2009 09:36 |
1. Introduction
The study of last things—the end times—is perhaps one of the most controversial studies in the church today. There are some that believe that if we do not believe in the pre-tribulational rapture that we are unsaved, or are gnostics.1 Right off the bat I want to state that I do not believe in the pre-tribulational rapture, but rather in a post-tribulational rapture—simply the Second Coming of Christ—without any of the pre-tribulational escapist ideas.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Theology -
Interpreting the Scriptures
|
|
Written by William Dicks
|
|
Monday, 19 October 2009 14:50 |
1. Introduction
Many times when studying the Bible people get to a point where they just cannot make sense of the passage in question. With the proper hermeneutical skills, many such difficulties could be solved.
Hermeneutics is the science and art of Biblical interpretation. It is a science because it is guided by rules within a system; and it is an art because the application of the rules is by skill, and not by mechanical imitation. 1
Admittedly, skill in the area of hermeneutics is not gained in a week or a month. It takes time and dedication. It takes hours and hours of thinking and rethinking. In order to do honest hermeneutics it may become necessary to throw out preconceived ideas, until such ideas are confirmed by the proper study of God’s Word. And, such study is not achieved by a superficial glimpse into the riches of God’s Word. Once artificial study of God’s Word becomes a habit, one will almost never get to the point where Biblical knowledge becomes part of who we are.
|
|
Last Updated on Monday, 19 October 2009 15:01 |
|
Read more...
|
|
Theology -
Systematic Theology
|
|
Written by William Dicks
|
|
Thursday, 15 October 2009 10:26 |
1. Introduction
Luke’s second book [Acts] does not seem to have a conclusion. At the end, Paul is still preaching in Rome, and the book does not tell us what became of him or of the rest of the church. Luke had a theological reason for this, for the story he was telling shall not come to an end before the end of all history. 1
When Jesus said, “I will build My church; and the gates of Hades will not overpower it” (Mt 16:18) he meant it. Jesus, at no time, lost control of His church through the many ages of struggle. Jesus said, “I will build My church” and the fact remains that He did and He is still working on it to perfect it. He also said, “the gates of Hades will not overpower it” which still remains in effect today. At no time has the devil been able to overpower it, notwithstanding what many in the church today believe.
|
|
Last Updated on Thursday, 15 October 2009 12:49 |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 1 of 3 |
Theology
